I recently had to come back home, to a village which is now only really known for one person — Nick Drake. I’m now two decades older than he was when he died, so I have definitely spent more time in that tiny village than he ever did. I went to school there, lived down the road, played tennis there. I sat on the steps beneath the village green cross and smoked weed — much like him. In the summer months there’s little better than getting a pint of ale and stretching out on the green, sinking into the buttercups and thinking about absolutely nothing — which, to be honest, he must also have done.

It wasn’t until my early twenties that I even knew he came from Tanworth-in-Arden. It takes a while for the brain to build up enough courage to properly experience sentimentality. For a brief moment back then, I wished I had experienced Tanworth in the 60s, gone to Oxford, drifted around with the band Fairport Convention and quietly disappeared. One of the things about his life is the banality of it; nothing really seems to have happened, and yet the world’s woes seem to pour out of it. It is certainly intriguing, and judging by his Reddit page, people still pour over every lyric and every detail in every photo.

Tanworth, for me, was a place of emptiness — and from that, a place of escapism. I wanted to leave, to finish school, to make things. Theoretically, the area carries all this cultural weight — the Pre-Raphaelites, fragments of English poetry, W. H. Auden, Philip Larkin, later the mythologised countryside of bands like Led Zeppelin and Birmingham bands like Black Sabbath or Steel Pulse — but in reality it was just another commuter-belt village, giving white-collar workers from Birmingham, Coventry and Solihull a kind of mini-castle in the country.

Historically it wasn’t empty at all. This is the Forest of Arden — Shakespeare’s Arden — As You Like It, and that line, “Now I am in Arden, the more fool I”, which always stuck out to me, being the fool in Arden that I am. A place that was once imagined as wild, magical and disorienting has slowly been flattened into something pastel green and off-white. But what I always wondered was what lay beneath the manicured lawns — perhaps a darkness. There is definitely darkness present in Drake’s work. In Riverman, for me, there’s a circular string arrangement based on Delius; at the end of the simple chord progression, the move from E inside a C major to E flat immediately draws a curtain across the open window. It’s as dark as anything Sabbath wrote.

My grandparents lived there too, just down the road — everything is “just down the road” in those villages. A web of places populated by a post-war generation who worked in Birmingham: factory workers, managers, owners. A few stops on the train and you were in Birmingham, which had once been the second richest industrial city in the UK until the industrial decline in the 60s and 70s.

That relationship — between the pastoral and the industrial — always sits slightly awkwardly, or strangely, within me. As illustrated by another Midland icon — J. R. R. Tolkien. The dichotomy in his work becomes moral: countryside good, industry bad. But in reality it doesn’t work like that. The countryside here wasn’t separate from industry; it was built on top of it. The “heaven” paid for by the “hell”.

My grandmother’s house sat in a large wood and, less romantically, right next to a golf club. It was built in a strange, almost meta way in the grounds of their previous house, and my grandfather filmed the whole thing, shown in the film above. After the war, before golf took over, he was obsessed with a Bolex camera. He shot, edited and directed everything himself. I sometimes think that, given the chance, he might have gone into film instead of making steel screws.

A path ran from the house to the golf club, cutting through one of the remaining fragments of the Forest of Arden. On either side were linden and oak trees. What I remember is the light — sunlight caught on these broad, semi-transparent green leaves, like open palms. It felt like being inside something architectural, like a church that’s bigger on the inside than the outside. It made me wonder if churches had borrowed from forests — trunks becoming columns, branches becoming beams, the steeple like in a nursery rhyme rising out of interlocked hands.

Halfway along that path, high up, there was a treehouse — a box perched and camouflaged in the highest branches. My uncle built it. He had a terrible car crash, almost died, and suffered serious injuries. Later, and according to my mother closely related to this, he became an alcoholic and died from that just a few years ago. Towards the end there were stories — empty vodka bottles hidden in bushes and behind trees. It became gossip, the kind of thing that floats around but isn’t looked at directly. I didn’t really take it in until he was found dead in his front room.

I remember a midsummer evening when I was about fourteen. My grandmother told me it was the longest day of the year. I found that completely mind-blowing — how could someone possibly know that just by looking at a tree? It never occurred to me until much later that she’d probably just heard it on Radio 4 that morning.

That night, in front of the ever-blazing fire (summer and winter) in her 1960s modernist house sunk into the trees, I started looking more closely at everything. The furnishings all seemed to lean into the environment — green carpets like moss, heavy green curtains, parquet floors, probably sourced from some deforested part of the world and then placed back into a version of nature that felt controlled, aesthetic — the outdated aesthetic that shaped my memories and now somehow underlies my work.

The house hadn’t been touched since the 70s. It was full of strange pockets of time — tourist plates, childhood books from the 20s, balls of string, and vintage electrical equipment like torches and binoculars from the war. The binoculars now sit on my bookshelf — not as objects, but for what they might have seen. The place felt like a series of wormholes into 70s aesthetics, a lost and forgotten moodboard, with shelves of tourist plates and scattered remnants of earlier lives. These objects often crop up in films, old books and flea markets. The question of how you would ever choose something like that only gains context once you see it in a magazine image in a second-hand bookshop or — most recently for me — when I recognised the psychedelic carpet in Peter Bogdanovich’s film What’s Up, Doc?, set in a San Francisco hotel, made the same year the house was built.

My grandfather was in Burma during the war. He joined in 1939 through the Territorial Army and spent most of the war behind the front lines, clearing up after the fighting. He was buried alive by a mortar explosion at one point, but dug out. He survived it, carried on. He lived in extreme conditions — heat, illness, isolation — something closer to what we later associate with the Vietnam War, but with far less support and more primitive technology.

Nick Drake’s father was also in Burma, in the Royal Engineers. It’s hard not to think about that when listening to his music. However overplayed it’s become, there’s something in it that feels like it is constantly trying to heal something else. In a teenage sense it’s angst, but I suspect it could be related to familial, historical and geographic contexts.

After the war, Birmingham went through a huge economic boom. People made money, bought houses, moved outwards into places like Tanworth. Coventry, nearby, was heavily bombed and then rebuilt quickly in the 50s and 60s — effectively covered over. A clean surface put on top of something that wasn’t really resolved.

For a long time I thought of someone like Anselm Kiefer as exploiting that history — using the war as material. But his work doesn’t smooth anything over. It does the opposite. It leaves it exposed, like an open wound. His repetition of the open wound is a constant reminder. It’s a firm rebuttal to traditional monuments, but it is still the aesthetic of healing — perhaps suggesting that darkness can do just as much as light.

That’s what feels different here. Places like Tanworth feel calm, settled, resolved. But that calm is constructed. It sits on top of something else, something much darker. In the case of Drake, Kiefer and my own experience, it is always the war and its industrial aftermath. Those experiences didn’t disappear — they just became less visible. For a brief moment they were replaced by boom, but unfortunately it was an industrial, polluting boom. So in a way, the escape to the country was away not just from trauma of the war, but also from the trauma of the landscape.

We don’t really connect the music that came after the war in Britain to that inheritance. Before the hedonism of Zeppelin and Sabbath, there must have been a quieter atmosphere — something shaped by silence, by things not fully processed. Music as a kind of indirect expression, rather than something explicit. This was perhaps hinted at by the British folk movement, which never reached the same scale as hard rock.

This tendency to cover things over — to build something calm and coherent on top of something deeply disturbed — may be the heart of the matter. A village, a house, a type of music: a British attitude to trauma.

Nick Drake’s enigma sits at the centre of this. Lying on the village green, half soaked in English bitter, listening to Drake, dreaming of the past. It’s an easy balm to the world’s problems — violins over ruins — but we should be grateful to be here to listen.

After all, there’s a lot of bodies under those ruins.

Video – The Bowley Reels, No.43, Building Desails, 1974. Dir. Leonard Bowley

Nothing impresses me more than watching a person—or even just knowing a person—can do good work calmly and clearly despite all the complex, difficult, and emotional storms around them. Sometimes I wonder if it’s an integral part of some people’s personality—a skill that cannot be learned. The world may be on fire, but this type of person clears a space within the inferno and gets down to it.

As I look out the window, past the Tom Clancy paperbacks and the dying cactus, I think about the famous New York traffic controller with their white gloves, elegantly directing traffic, taking charge of an impossible tangle of aggressive emotions and powerful machines. It’s a cliché often realized as a kind of poetic dance in films, but the metaphor remains. The solid personality, the public face of government administration, the soft arm of the law, keeping the blood pumping through the veins of the city.

I’m sitting in one of London’s remaining ‘real’ cafés, just north of Camden Town, run by an Eastern European grand-dame. She seems to have mothered children into her seventies and, by all accounts, does the table service, coffee making, cooking, and hosting herself. The café is dressed in a palette that presents itself as burgundy whichever way you look. Book covers become burgundy, a painting of a sunset over a Mediterranean town glows with a burgundy haze, all the woodwork, the cheaply upholstered seats, and even the 1970s menu covers—covering menus unchanged since the 70s—are a rough, deep, brown-red. The place is stuck in perpetual dawn, suspended between night and morning.

Looking up from possibly the worst poached egg in the world—white bread, watery egg, a lettuce leaf, a cold tomato slice—I notice the mat my breakfast debris rests on. Its pallor contrasts sharply with the dawn (or sunset) implied by the rest of the interior. It depicts a French village street scene in a longing, faded Wes Anderson gouache style, probably painted in the 1980s, worn down by thousands of unsatisfied hands. All the placemats in the café are the same. When I was young, I always wondered why placemats sold together were always identical. Surely that was a missed opportunity. This small, strange experience probably foretold a suspicious relationship to pictures generally: sequential monotony, missed chances to display original art, and so on. I avoid the obvious fantasising about who this anonymous artist is or was.

The image is so faded and worn it is mostly patina—a texture formed through the natural use of the object over its lifetime. The recorded passing of hands, the dents made by cutlery and sauce bottles. Mini rituals, repeated over a lifetime, often feel more important than grand ceremonies dedicated to gods. They are a humble echo of stone steps worn into dips, or sculptures polished by the touch of drunk tourists, but here the ritual is from one mug of tea to the next egg sandwich.

Beyond the chaos of blobs, splats, and spots, the scene appears to be a gently lolling country town, probably in Provence. Probably in the afternoon—at least as most Brits imagine Provence, where time seems to pause around 3pm. The weather is neither sunny nor overcast; it’s just blank. The café’s faded billiards sign reads “Dame Confection” over a slightly dark, suggestive alley. It’s a melancholic pause instigated by a door left ajar. Tables are set outside, awnings stretch overhead, flowerpots on window sills hold upright, alive blooms—or perhaps wooden crafty replicas. Dirty wine glasses squat on the tables, and water cascades over a cake-decoration-style fountain. But unlike my café, the scene is empty, a dead landscape, not a soul around.

The lady of my café begins a long FaceTime call, probably with a friend rather than a relation, as it’s difficult to imagine such patience with family. Four builders come in, followed by another son, then a man, older. The builders order sandwiches while the waitress—owner, cook, and host all in one—pauses between phone nods to take their order. One hand on a child’s head she pivots, ballet-like, into the kitchen. She rests the phone beside the industrial toaster. One hand operates the fear-inducing silver boiling water spout, screaming its high-pitched note as tea mugs are filled. The older man talks to the child; the builders talk to each other. I ask for the bill. Two well-dressed tennis players enter, carrying big bags, striding across the café with impudent gait.

One of the pleasures of being in a café early is watching it fill, each person entering their day in their own arrogant way. Morning, more than any other time, seems to bring out the worst in people. Each feels most important in their world, vying for attention, staking a claim, asserting their right to demand.

The waitress parries the conversations with nobility, deftly progressing through the next ten minutes. I myself raise and lower my first finger, as if to indicate I have somewhere important to go—which I definitely do not. I start thinking seriously about the ‘important’ tasks I have to complete that day. Could she not understand my pressing appointments, the significant artistic contribution I am going to make to humanity?

Five minutes later, I find myself walking up the grey, slimy street toward my flat. The post has arrived: a letter from the taxman asking for another grand. Next door, the builders have started an extension the size of the house itself. No offers for work in the inbox, only time-wasters, desperate emails begging me to review underpants, Amazon delivery updates, and gallery responses that misunderstand my original messages—it all amounts to an anxious, 21st-century irritation. Balancing on top of this mound of faeces, how am I to start drawing? How can I put it all aside to begin something that earns no money, takes time, and is difficult?

Rather than face it, I pick up my phone and look at the last picture I took: the placemat, the mottled empty street. At the back, a tiny stick figure stands with a rectangular object in front of them. It can only be one thing—the artist, sitting calmly in his storm, zen-like, ignoring the torrent of brown bruises around him. Unaware of the ugly marks, he carries on with total clarity. A true plein-air painter. Strangely, I had never considered that plein-air painting might actually be difficult—with the weather, the people asking irritating questions, the performance aspect—but here he is, patient, organized, and focused, possibly painting the very scene depicted on the placemat—the scene now firmly imprinted in my memory.

Yesterday I woke up lost amongst the usual five horsemen of the artist’s apocalypse: money, envy (permanent), ambition (too much), success (lack of), and inspiration (misplaced). It felt like leaving the atmosphere of one of the busy rooms from the art college I attended twenty years ago, a week before the final show: musty portacabins, semi-permanent, dusty anxiety, stressful artistic negotiations — zero confidence in the work and zero money in the bank, insecurities lodged deep in a plastic alleyway of institutional semi-permanence.

Lying there, staring at the ceiling, I became fixated on the fear that I lack a central idea — that I don’t have a structure strong enough to hold my work together. That this absence might explain my uneasy sense of failure. My thoughts drifted into a long hall of past artworks. Moving through them, I realised they weren’t arranged in time but in space. Some were finished, some abandoned, some only ever existed as fragments — and remained fragments. Each occupied a room in the architecture of my mind: a bizarre, semi-permanent interior where every work I’ve made, imagined, or discarded still resides. This imagined environment slips between places and eras — the romantic lounges of early eighteenth-century France, downtown New York in the early 1980s, English castles in the 1500s — not as references exactly, but as atmospheres.

I had an idea: maybe I had come up with a new way of working, or at least thinking about work that is not using a studio in the literal sense, and it is not about focusing on a finished body of work. It is the act of building an imagined space that exists before any single artwork is made. A mental environment where ideas gather: materials, scale, research, practical constraints, possible contexts of display, and my own self-imposed (stretchable) timelines. The building doesn’t dictate how the work looks. It dictates how work comes into being. Ideas go in — work comes out. The process is what’s repeated, not the outcome.

The works that emerge from this space may differ wildly from one another, because they are made in relation to a shared internal structure rather than as isolated objects. The building contains everything: a research library, a workshop, and a provisional exhibition space held together in the imagination. Ideas can be tested, rearranged, or abandoned before they solidify into objects, and no single work is forced to carry the entire weight of judgement on its own.

This imagined architecture is not fixed. It shifts as research accumulates, ideas are tested, or circumstances change. Holding it in mind early offers a way of navigating the unstable lifespan of a body of work. Decisions about form, material, concept, and direction are like the soft furnishings in each room; they are made in dialogue with a larger structure rather than in isolation. The larger structure is the practical elements of making the work and, in this scenario, becomes the foundations and walls of the building.

For individual artists in the real world, studios, galleries, museums, and audiences provide a concrete version of this foundational structure. Galleries offer cultural position, physical exhibition space, and economic framework. These structures do an enormous amount of invisible labour — far more than they are often credited for. They are not neutral containers for work but engines that generate audience, capital, and lifestyle. They ‘midwife’ the work coming into the world.

When an artist lacks access to this infrastructure, the work does not disappear — but the labour multiplies. Everything the gallery would normally hold becomes another job to be imagined, organised, paid for, and sustained. Time slows. Progress fragments. The artist must construct not only the work, but the conditions under which the work might exist.

This is where the imagined architecture becomes essential rather than indulgent. Without external structures, the internal building expands. It becomes detailed enough to hold context, audience, judgement, and completion. It grows vertically, then spiritually. What began as a workspace becomes something closer to a cathedral: a place where belief, doubt, and evaluation circulate.

For example, many galleries bring an audience. Whoever they show will get an audience. Often the illusion artists live under is that their work is good because of the size of the audience they seem to bring, but the gallery’s reputation often brings it. The gallery could show almost anyone and the audience would come. This can snowball: the audience convinces itself of the artist’s genius and buys work on that basis, and on and on — and this is how the emperor gets his clothes.

The audience varies with medium. For musicians there is direct reaction — there is clapping. For fine artists there is no such audience. There are whispers and comments, reviews of which there are remarkably fewer these days. There is the private view, but even there everyone is a potential liar. Everyone is polite, and for very good reason: most people in the room are artists, and they know what it took to make the work. They are going to be kind. Most of the time the work is witnessed by a single silent spectator. There is no audience — certainly not a ticket-buying one, unless you are a dead artist. Just one or two people, briefly. Surely a fantastic imaginary congregation is better than this.

So without this reception, without this stage, how do artists gauge their work? If it is not through a publisher, not through critics, and only partially through an imagined audience, then who decides? How do they know what they are making is good? How do they learn, adjust, and move on?

They can try to compare themselves to other artists, but it is never within the same framework. Artists with blue-chip galleries operate at a completely different scale — it is like comparing playing at a village fête to playing at Glastonbury. They can compare themselves to so-called comparable artists, but that too quickly becomes a mystery. Where does that other person’s money come from? A trust fund? Sales? A secret job? The conditions are opaque, the metrics unreliable.

There is only one place left for the artist to gauge their work: inside their newly consecrated imaginary cathedral. Here they can find their answers, because all the answers have already been built into the space itself — into the pillars, the pulpits, the glass windows, the arches, the decorated ceilings. Once the questions have been bounced around the space long enough, the final and most important one inevitably emerges: when is the work finished?

Eventually the cathedral becomes a complete world, with its own limits and deadlines. Work is finished by returning to the original plans drawn up at the start. Once complete, it is documented, stored, and laid to rest—either in the long corridor of other works, just a foot away from the red velvet carpet running down the centre of the hallway, or in a panelled room, or in a polished concrete box. Or perhaps it’s put out the back in an epicly huge cemetery. I lie there, wondering. Any minute now I’ll get up. Any minute now.

Image : Liu Lingchao’s portable house, 2013

The institutional tiles beneath my feet screamed public swimming pool, and if that wasn’t enough, the huge red hole—like the orifice of some great beast—presented itself to me. The echo of children’s screams spilled from inside the glowing plastic trumpet. The hallowed space of the 1990s water park was calling.

I was wasting time—daydreaming as usual—while trying to gather my New Year notes. List writing, editing, and rewriting is one of my main pastimes. I spend more time doing this than any other part of my practice. Why? Sections lead to lists, lists lead to projects, projects lead to new sections. They form an interlocking map of ideas, constantly wavering between procrastination and efficiency. At what point do notes and lists stop being signposts to work and become work in themselves?

There’s no feeling like being in a public swimming pool in the early 1990s. The clammy cold warmth, strangers’ bodies, the endless parade of counters just slightly too high to see over. Flip-flops and discarded towels, stray plasters and rubber key bracelets.

My local Midlands pool, minutes away from Birmingham’s notoriously tangled Spaghetti Junction, was also blessed with a terrifying high diving board and waterslides of various speeds, sizes, and angles. Even as a memory, I can taste the tepid, chlorinated water.

As I wait in line on the stairs for one of the slides, I dream not of the Space Invader crisps and soft drinks that awaited me at the end of the ride—the gold I’d been imagining on the drive there—but of potential dangers. Jagged edges of plastic, where fibreglass sheets are joined, stare at me like paper cuts, waiting for the opportunity to slice my innocent, exposed skin. Each step up gives me a new perspective, a new chance to turn back. And once I’ve entered this dark, liminal space, what could possibly be around the corner? Who knows—the tunnel disappears after only a few feet, a tunnel I know must leave the building to return, hopefully, into the plunge pool. How could something like this possibly exist? How could someone make this? What engineer, what architect, my raw child mind asks itself, could have created such an octopus monster, a suburban Kraken?

I tell myself I make lists to create green spaces. These spaces are times when I can work on a project; everything else in life is dedicated to creating them. They are periods when all the art is made—this, now, this moment I write, is a green space. They are not just times when I make a sculpture or write something; they are spaces sculpted and formed by everything that went into making them: the amount of money I could make, the materials I could find, the space I work in, and of course the ideas that go into them. These lists are the tubes that lead to the green space. They provide the psychological framework within which the work is made. Each and every time, I try to list the way I got there, to preserve the journey, to hopefully replicate it next time. It’s like trying to create a map from the present moment to the work, to a future me, which of course then becomes the present moment.

To get to the top of the Hydrofume—the name given to the slide that incorporated both a trip outside and a vertical drop—I had to walk up painted concrete steps, covered in a slim rubber mat to prevent accidents. Strangers revealed their personalities as they passed: some with confidence, others with trepidation, all different heights and weights, all in tight, colourful Speedos. At around eleven years old, the only time I saw a stranger’s semi-naked body was on television—a time before the internet, even before Page 3, when kissing was more familiar when done to an extra-terrestrial than to other humans. In the early 1990s, tattoos were rare and always darkly exotic. All I knew of them was that they reminded me of lists and science diagrams, combined with a dark foreboding probably brought about by Robert De Niro’s painted torso in Cape Fear. They seemed like strange labels, lists pointing towards hearts and bones, sailing ships and ropes.

Tattoos are made under the guise of signifiers: they are meant to mean something, to point to something else, whether that meaning is deliberate or not. Most often the message travels from the outside inward—from naval tattoos like Hold Steady across the knuckles to personal relationships, birth dates, or simply mum. They seem to point towards the heart. Somehow their meaning is created through a kind of biological osmosis, as if ink pumped through the dermis, combined with blood, could take the outside world of words, images, and diagrams and push them closer to the heart—the resting place of the soul.

These are thoughts I have now as I think of myself, arms crossed, hurtling through a small plastic tube. I remember even then being aware of the thickness of the plastic—so thin that light shone through it. This membrane was my second skin, protecting me from the outside world. Freefall, turning, completing a circle, then re-entering the building. In the warm, intestine-like interior, I anticipated—or imagined—the cold outside world. I screwed my eyes shut, praying for the experience to be over, for the destination to be reached. The internal scream—mum, are we nearly there yet?—reached new watery lows.

I look back at the computer in front of me. The twists and turns of lists give way to more lists—where do they point? Like the plot of a bad sequel to Memento, it quickly becomes unclear what state of mind I was in when I made one list or another. What was my intention? Wasn’t there a decision two weeks ago to relabel everything, to date it all and put it into more specific folders? When I made that alteration—did I cross it off the list?

Or is this a list for a new work? Or a cautionary note about a person, a lover, an artwork, or a life? Or simply a to-do far removed from art altogether? Like De Niro’s movie tattoos, they are fake—notes designed to distract, empty characters written for a backstory that was never pursued, a work never resolved.

The blood rushes to my head as water swooshes and sloshes in my ears. The final vertical drop approaches. All thoughts and ideas, plans and rules, past and future are shaken inside the plastic tube—a godlike test tube, a cocktail shaker with memories for ice cubes. Words rush forth, pathways coalesce, then suddenly, when the mind can take no more, I reach the bottom of the ride, the end of the list. I have entered the Green Space. The destination. All is peaceful. The actual work can happen. I have skin in the game.

For a few moments I am suspended in bliss. I am in my green space—underwater. But within a few seconds in the plunge pool, or a few hours in the studio, it is over. I can’t breathe. I must, at all costs, find air. I bolt upward, swimming for my life: towards civilisation, towards a job that needs to be done, messages that have to be replied to. The real world rushes in. Before I know it, I’ve crawled out, back to reality. Cold, humid, recycled air fills my lungs. Gravity takes hold. My body shifts from suspension to feeling… reality hits. And that’s it. It’s the end.

There’s nothing else to do but climb the steps. Choose another tube. Make another list. Go again.

Image : Sandcastle Waterpark, families in the wave pool, Blackpool Gazette, 1987

I saw a butterfly on the Tube the other day. To be precise, it was about 10:30 a.m. on a grey Tuesday morning. I stepped onto the Northern Line heading south and looked to my right, towards the loud, expectant low grumble. A young woman walked past, dressed in ‘new beige.’ Her white shoes squeaked assertively.

As she veered to her left, she left in her wake a butterfly. The butterfly was moving, drifting to and fro, fluttering in the air currents that surely had their own language—their own special subterranean paths. As I watched, the butterfly flew perilously close to the tracks; the depth of the trench versus the tiny size of the butterfly gave a strange sense of vertigo.

Is there anyone in this world who does not think about life in this way? Confusing, abandoned, and out of place. From this confusion, this messy collision of feelings and facts, artists find the kernel of every idea. They navigate life’s shifting winds—these pulls and pushes—dragged down by a sense of worried existence, weaving all of it into their work with technical skill—or brute force. From that mess, they create a kind of ladder—a ladder that, in the corner of their eye, they imagine could take them to the moon.

Yet artists somehow know, deep down, that what they are searching for is not simply creation for others but reflection—an understanding of themselves, and that in some way all the navigating, questioning, crafting, and skill is itself some kind of necessary message—a kind of labour that is a reflection of our struggle.

This butterfly, which for all intents and purposes resembles a bait dangling on a fishing line, becomes an easy metaphor for all of us. It’s a gentle, tragic reminder of our fragile lives. Born from a twinkle in nature’s eye, it mirrors our own creative path: a ladder rising from chaos, a struggle between the pull of imagination and the certain weight of death.

At the journey’s end, we dance off into the void, into darkness, yet it is not until we reach that darkness—as the butterfly did, flying down into the tunnel—that its dance (its artwork) becomes truly significant. It was only when its shape and form disappeared into the darkness, when it rejoined the place it came from, that I could reflect on and appreciate the disjointed poetry of this dance—the end object, the memory.

“And I, infinitesimal being, drunk with the great starry void, likeness, image of mystery—I felt myself a pure part of the abyss.”
— Pablo Neruda

Image : Richard Nik Evans, Red (detail), 2006

It always feels like art fairs, such as Frieze, take more than they give. They are maximalist experiences, overloaded with spectacle and noise, whereas studio visits are minimalist, intimate, and often fragile. The irony is that when an art fair comes to town — a little like a circus or sideshow — artists often follow, or are dragged along, and that can lead to studio visits. Yet the intense, feverish energy of the fair, charged with false promises of fame, money, and truth, tends to leak into the studio. The fair frames and fuels the visit, and everything becomes infected with its urgency and superficial glare.

On a recent visit, my guest arrived visibly pumped. After half an hour of art-world gossip, we finally had to confront the elephant in the room — the work itself. It’s always a difficult bridge to build when the visitor makes or exhibits work very different from what they’re looking at. Ideally, both sides start bridge-building and meet in the middle; in reality, one tends to race ahead while the other hesitates, becoming the spectator in the room.

The visitor slumped into the only comfortable chair, ghost-like under its dirty sheet, distracted by last night’s booze and the endless stream of images flickering across his phone. He hadn’t really looked up since his first introductory monologue. You could almost see the party invites and private views reflected in his pupils. Every so often, he’d glance up and say things like, “I love it,” “Keep going,” or “Do more!” These didn’t feel like platitudes exactly, but they didn’t feel like real engagement either. The takeaway seemed to be: “I like where this is going, where you’ve been, but it’s not really my thing.” Later, as I was driving him to the next opening, we stopped at a red light — and he got out at that one.

The next day, I was back at Frieze myself. The crowd felt like a sea of Argos level paparazzi — even if only for their own Instagram feeds — each visitor photographing what they agreed with. I thought about the studio visit and realised I was doing the same thing. I was looking for work that fitted my own values and aesthetics. I wanted confirmation — to see my careful mix of concept, art, and psychology reflected back at me. Here I was, pretending to discover new work but actually just wandering through the fair, searching for validation rather than encountering work on its own terms.

Why couldn’t I, as yesterday’s visitor seemed to suggest, judge the work by reading its history — by seeing how it had developed into something original, even if it wasn’t ‘my thing’? Why couldn’t I take pleasure in watching a work form its own language, one I could learn to read because it was teaching me how to see it? Would it be possible, I wondered, to move through an art fair and see each work in the context of its own world rather than my own — to bring curiosity instead of personal, cynical judgement?

Why are we all obsessed with defending our own set of values — insisting there’s only one way art should move forward, only one lens through which it can be understood? It mirrors how we see the world itself: we conform to freedom, but only our version of it. We all know there are hundreds of routes, hundreds of art worlds, yet we still insist on our way or the highway.

Art fairs should be the perfect opportunity to test this openness — a mirror of the art world, a hotbed of discovery and serendipity. But in practice, every element that could support real engagement is lost. The context is commercial, not academic. The atmosphere is like a crowded nightclub with great wallpaper, where you barely know the people you’re shouting at, not the quiet of a gallery where the work can breathe. No artist makes work to be shown at an art fair. The space rarely complements the work. The gallerists, understandably, just want to survive the weekend — financially and mentally.

It’s difficult to stay open when everything around you is closing you down.

And yet, despite all this, perhaps Frieze has given me more than it has taken. Through the fog of hangovers and hurried studio visits, I’ve stumbled upon a quieter, more generous way of looking — one that might just outlast the concept of the art fair itself.

Image : Eppo Doeve, The Chess Players, 1946 at Frieze Masters 2025 

Recently, someone failed to respond to a personal message that I had spent some time writing. I hadn’t spoken to them in a couple of years, but they had been an important part of my life, if only briefly. As time went by I started to get a creeping feeling of uncertainty, of being in limbo, helpless, suspended in anxiety — a feeling we’ve all grown used to, though it has become more prevalent and often tied to anxiety since we started using the internet as a kind of mirror. A mirror that doesn’t answer back, but instead presents us with heightened, often unwanted or unrealistic desires.

This unanswered desire, this creeping uncertainty, is a feeling artists know too well. It is a key essence of art-making: the uncertainty of which direction to go in, of whether what you’re doing has any value, how it will be received, if the work will ever be shown. Artists have to live in a state of constant uncertainty and delayed gratification. If they don’t accept this, they cannot fully engage in their practice. If they resist uncertainty, they often fall back on the rules of design or advertising, making art that fulfills a function rather than exploring unknown possibilities.

I think this feeling has deep roots in Western culture. The madness of endless productivity has trained humans to get used to absence and loss; the machine discards people. Think of how many people simply disappeared in war, or just walked out of a house — never to return. I think of the moment in The Grapes of Wrath, where Tom Joad leaves, simply disappears. In the narrative, it is to join the larger cause, the class struggle. But to me, as a teenager, it was just the raw experience of loss. I just couldn’t get over how you would build up a character like that just to dispose of him, metaphor or not.

In the 21st century, technology allows us to be found and tracked at all times, yet this very ease of connection has paradoxically increased loneliness and uncertainty. The easier it is to reach someone, the less we actually do. Could it be that we miss the real loss of someone — this feeling of disappearance that we have been socialized over the centuries to accept — so much that we’ve had to invent substitutes: ghosting, breadcrumbing, orbiting, submarining, or benching? In simple terms, psychologically weaponizing the act of disappearance.

I think artists who have trained themselves to live in this uncertain state are in a unique position to deal with it. They are disassociated from fixed aims and goals and can see uncertainty as a healthy, mindful state, turning it from fear, shame, or anxiety into a creative state of mind. But to do this, we first have to see it and label it as a natural part of the human condition — day-to-day life. We must be comfortable sitting in the darkness, knowing that no response may be itself a response, but also a mirror back to the original question, and that questions are sometimes worth asking, even without answers.

Image : Rachel Rose, Pitch Black Verdigris Green, 2022

veritybirtDAH10_670

.

An A Moment of Eternal Noise radio special on Witches with guests Una Hamilton Helle curator of the touring exhibition Waking the Witch and exhibiting artist Verity Birt. First broadcast in November on Resonance FM.

This one hour show features sound collages, spoken word, soundtracks, new music, field recordings and discussion covering various Witch related issues including how Witches in art and popular culture can reflect social concerns such as gender, labour division, exploitation and resistance.

Image – Performance still from Deformation Attends Her by Verity Birt, performed on the Vernal Equinox. Dance by Alys North, readings by Verity Birt and sound by Philip Serfaty. https://www.veritybirt.co.uk/

AMOEN Verhoeven


.
A Moment of Eternal Noise Radio stitches together samples, field recordings, interviews and tracks taken from recent cultural events, new music releases and audio archives.

This (death of) Summer mix jumps from Block Universe Performing Arts Festival with sound artist Hanne Lippard to field recordings at the Baptistery in Pisa via Tom Cruise and finishes with an interview with Julie Verhoeven.

The image is taken from Julie Verhoeven’s collection of vintage ephemeral which can be seen at http://julieverhoeven.tumblr.com/

Tracks excerpts and samples include…

Stein Um Stein, Vierzehn
Dab, John Oswald
Analogue Mountains, Lucrecia Dalt
The Girl I Haven’t Met, Kudasai
Gothic Submarine, Delia Derbyshire
Move Brilliancy, Bobby Fisher’s 21 moves
Reflection, Hanne Lippard
Dark/Light 1, Meredith Monk
These Boots Are Made for Walking, Crispin Glover
Smooth Operator, Sade
Winer Morning II (with Robert De Niro), Woodkid & Nils Frahm

Chris Dorland interviewed in his New Jersey studio in May 2018. The interview covers his art practice, influences, struggles, materials, his role as director and founder of Magenta Plains gallery, NYC and his recent show at Aetopoulos Gallery.

Chris Dorland http://chris-dorland.com/

Aetopoulos Gallery http://www.aetopoulos.info/

Magenta Plains http://magentaplains.com/

IMG_6952editforAMomentWebsite


.
A Moment of Eternal Noise Radio weaves together samples, field recordings, interviews and tracks taken from recent cultural events, new music releases and audio archives.

This months highlights include Ligeti’s Metronome performance at the British library, Brian Eno on why not too get a job, Sigur Ros’s new project Route One, Ruben Östlund’s film The Square, Bill Murray, Jonathan Wilson and classic Nino Rota. Photo features Bill Murray and Karlheinz Stockhausen.

This months mix also includes a new feature The Random Track of Kindness. Here we play a random(ish) track dedicated to a person who performed a random altruistic act – such as buying a random stranger coffee. Did you witness such an act today? If so please email the radio station so I can feature it on future shows.

Tracks, excerpts and samples include…

Stockhausen on human evolution
Struktur II, Karlheinz Stockhausen
Tired of Getting Pushed around, 2 Men and A Drum
The Square, Film Trailer
How to act like an ape, Terry Notary
The Radom Track of Kindness – I think were alone now, The Rubinoos
Piano Solo from the movie Plein Soleil (Purple Noon), Nino Rota
Poème symphonique, György Ligeti
Genetically (Central Processing Unit), Nadia Struiwigh
Mod 9EX, Andreas Gursky and Ritchie Hawtin
Don’t get a job, Brian Eno
Sigur Rós – Route One
Talk excerpt, Richard Evans and Brian Dawn Chalkey
Memories of You, Benny Goodman
Over the Midnight, Jonathan Wilson

002TheShipweb 

After talking to Brian Dawn Chalkley about contributing to a show for our project space FLAT:TWO he invited himself around my studio and bought the entire Chelsea M.A. with him. We recorded the interview and here it is in it’s entirety discussing the struggles and successes of making work. Covering all the important chapters of my career from studying at Chelsea to showing in commercial galleries, moving to New York and running project spaces. Image is The Ship project space on Cable street in 2002.

concorde in the rain AMOEN March 2018
.

.
A Moment of Eternal Noise is a show on London Fields Radio that weaves together recent cultural discoveries by Richard Evans in a seamless aural collage.

On this show which is pre-recorded in the gallery FLAT:TWO we take a look at Concorde, suffragettes, lighthouses and a shipping forecast that involves Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire.

Tracks, excerpts and samples include…

Concorde takes off
The Combine, John Maus
New York to London, inflight recording
Spitfire, Public Service Broadcasting
From the Air, Laurie Anderson
More Women, Saada Boonaire
Tokka, Agnes Obel
The Suffragettes, Pathe News
Memorial, Michael Nyman
Freedom or Death, Emmeline Pankhurst read by Emily Blunt
Get Thy Bearings, Bonobo
Swallowtail lighthouse bell
Rethikhly, Ricardo Villalobos & Max Loderbauer
Rain, Poppy Ackroyd
The life of a lighthouse keeper
Balladyna, Tomasz Stanko
Camera Obscura (1976 revision), François Bayle
The Shipping Forecast, Les Barker, read by Brian Perkins
Unfamiliar Wind (Leeks Hills), Brian Eno

If you are reading this as an email subscriber you can listen to the show either on the official London Fields Radio website….
.
http://www.londonfieldsradio.org/mix/a-moment-of-eternal-noise-march-2018/
.
Or on the A Moment of Eternal Noise Website…
.
https://amomentofeternalnoise.com/

 

Processed with VSCO with b3 preset


.
Richard Evans presents the first A Moment of Eternal Noise Radio show on London Fields Radio live from Wilton Way Cafe with special guest Rut Blees Luxemburg who discusses her recent show at Dominique Fiat Gallery in Paris. The show continues the website’s interest in connections between place, sound, music, film, art and narrative with interviews, spoken word, field recordings, sound and music. This months show takes a look at Alfred Hitchcock, early synthesizer the Trautonium, ornithology, author Amy Liptrot, T.S. Elliot, Nils Frahm and fan made Bladerunner soundtracks.

Tracks and excerpts include,

Le pas du Chat Noir, Anouar Brahem
When, Vincent Gallo
Diane, The Bachelors
The Days of Pearly Spencer, David McWilliams
Paper Trails, Darkside
Bird of Space, Bonnie Dobson
High Flying Bird, Judy Henske
The More I See You, Chris Montez
JF Sebastian, Vangelis (Bladerunner, Esper Version)
The Prodigal Son Brings Death, Vangelis (Bladerunner, Esper Version)
The Duke Arrives, John Carpenter
Have a Cigar, Gabriel Yared
Familiar, Nils Frahm
T.S.Eliot, The Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock
Poor Lazrus, Dave Van Ronk

IMG_2276WEB


.
This sound work is a first person narrative about a supernatural figure that appears on a ferry in the Greek islands and inhabits the bodies of sleeping tourists. By dissolving into a cloud of fog which envelopes the boat the protagonist possesses their bodies and travels back in time. The work combines traditional horror tropes and art historical references with a satirical tale of hyper-consumerism.

The work which was written and read by Richard Evans was made by recording cellist David Barbenel improvising to the story being played through headphones. The improvisations were cut into parts, looped and set against a soundscape of samples and field recordings. The work was shown at Aetopolous Gallery, Athens.